<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Indiana Tenth Amendment Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Indiana Tenth Amendment Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0" -->
	<itunes:summary>Indiana Tenth Amendment Center</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Indiana Tenth Amendment Center</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Indiana Tenth Amendment Center</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Government &quot;BUY&quot; the People&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/08/government-buy-the-people/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/08/government-buy-the-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiat money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.&#8221; - Thomas Jefferson Corporacracy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/08/money-pic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-93" src="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/08/money-pic-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>&#8220;I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>Corporacracy</p>
<p>There is a government inside &#8220;OUR&#8221; government, one that has no vested interest in you or your family&#8230;except!, stealing your money. This shadow government has been around longer than any of us alive today.</p>
<p>It is the system we were raised in and it will be the the system we die in, if we don&#8217;t start looking at the way we run our lives, businesses and government.</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with being on the left or right of the issues we face as a nation,those are the extreme&#8217;s and the average joe/jane just wants to live their life without having to worry about the government intruding into every aspect of it.&#8221;WE THE PEOPLE&#8221; have the power to stop the extremist in OUR governmemnt,STOP GIVING THEM THE POWER, THEY are the MINORITY,&#8221;WE&#8221; are the MAJORITY!</p>
<p>&#8221; You never want a serious crisis go to waste&#8221; Rahm Emanual</p>
<p>What are they Buying?&#8230;YOU</p>
<p>&#8220;If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Samuel Adams</p>
<p>A crisis is a crucial or decisive point or situation: a turning point.</p>
<p>Crises had been used to expand power and there is always a need to make the the decission while the people are to scared to object and before any opposition can be organized. All in the name of doing the right thing for the people and all the while it is just a ruse used to gain more power for what every corporacracy is being use to buy the citizens loyality.</p>
<p>The &#8220;crisis&#8221; we are in now is the same as the the one Franklin D. Roosevelt used in the &#8220;NEW DEAL&#8221; to give use corporacracies that we still have today.</p>
<p>SSA &#8211; Social Security Act</p>
<p>The Social Security Act was designed to combat the widespread poverty among senior citizens. The government program provided income to retired wage earners. The program has become one of the most popular government programs and is funded by current wage earners and their employers. However, in recent years concerns have arisen about the viability of continuing to fund the program as the Baby Boom generation reaches retirement age.</p>
<p>This program would have worked if the government didn&#8217;t steal the funds that were supposed to be set aside.</p>
<p>FHA &#8211; Federal Housing Administration</p>
<p>The Federal Housing Administration was a government agency created to combat the housing crisis of the Great Depression. The large number of unemployed workers combined with the banking crisis created a situation in which banks recalled loans. The FHA was designed to regulate mortgages and housing conditions.</p>
<p>Again this corporacracy has been a disaester, think Fannie Mae.</p>
<p>Agricultural Adjustment Administration</p>
<p>To establish and maintain such balance between the production and consumption of agricultural commodities, and such marketing conditions therefor, as will reestablish prices to farmers at a level that will give agricultural commodities a purchasing power with respect to articles that farmers buy, equivalent to the purchasing power of agricultural commodities in the base period.</p>
<p>A free market will take care of this program and we DO NOT HAVE A FREE MARKET! You can&#8217;t have a free market when you have the Federal Reserve manipulating the monatary system.</p>
<p>&#8220;WE THE PEOPLE&#8221; have lost control of our representative government,but WE can get it back.</p>
<p>Start by going &#8220;LOCAL&#8221;</p>
<p>Buy locally grow food, gas (yes we do have local <a href="http://www.countrymark.com/">gas</a> here in Indiana),  start banking at a local banks, credit unions and stop the withholding tax your employer takes out of your check each week.</p>
<p>The last suggestion has probably got alot of you thinking &#8220;He&#8217;s out of his mind!&#8221;, but stop and think a minute. What is the one thing that we all count on &#8220;DEATH AND TAXES&#8221;&#8230; well the government does to, but you can make them wait for it,  why not keep that money in a local bank or credit union and draw the interest on it for yourself and then pay at the end of the quarter or year. There&#8217;s nothing illegal about it, there&#8217;s nothing say that you have to have your employer be your &#8220;TAX AGENT&#8221;, on the W-4 form there&#8217;s a EXEMPT box, check it and your good to go.You can change your<a href="http://www.irs.gov/"> W-4</a> anytime you want.</p>
<p>EDUCATE YOURSELF ON THIS!  you must pay your taxes</p>
<p>We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land &#8212; nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.</p>
<p>- Daniel Webster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/08/government-buy-the-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana needs Constitutional Hemp</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/indiana-needs-constitutional-hemp/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/indiana-needs-constitutional-hemp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hemp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Founding Fathers of the United States of America saw good promise in hemp and some even farmed it themselves. Thomas Jefferson and George Washington both grew hemp, and Benjamin Franklin owned one of America’s first paper mills that produced durable and long-lasting hemp paper that was to play a crucial role in the founding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/hemp_farmer1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-88" src="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/hemp_farmer1.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="220" /></a><span id="more-84"></span>The Founding Fathers of the United States of America saw good promise in hemp and some even farmed it themselves. Thomas Jefferson and George Washington both grew hemp, and Benjamin Franklin owned one of America’s first paper mills that produced durable and long-lasting hemp paper that was to play a crucial role in the founding of a new nation. Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence on hemp paper, and other Founding documents written on hemp include Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense”, the Articles of Confederation, the Federalist (and Anti-Federalist) Papers, and the United States Constitution.</p>
<p>Hemp helped build America into what is is today,with out it &#8221; WE THE PEOPLE&#8221; could not sail the ships that brought goods from Europe, have the clothes we wore or the paper we wrote on. The uses for hemp are endless. George Washington said:  “Make use of the Indian hemp seed, and sow it everywhere!”</p>
<p> Lawmakers are reveiwing the draconian drug laws that Indiana has, <a title="Hemp Bill" href="http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2011/SB/SB0192.1.html" target="_blank">Senate Bill 0192</a> will look at possession and use, medical use and whether it should be treated like alcohol.</p>
<p>In the end this is a states&#8217; right&#8217;s issue,that has been down played by some that think it&#8217;s just old hippies and young kids that want to have a good time. The economic benefits that would be realize from legalization would be a far greater boost to society than the drain of the <a title="drug clock" href="http://www.drugsense.org/cms/wodclock">drug war</a> has now.</p>
<p>Indiana needs to lead the way into what will be common through out the world in twenty years, let&#8217;s quit letting a centralized government tell use what we can do with our bodies,property in our own state. The only way we will win against the Fed is to decentralize&#8230;<a title="your rights" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-Lb8YitPs8">TAKE BACK THE POWER WE GAVE</a>&#8230;it is ours, not theirs and if WE stand up, they will back down!</p>
<p>Take Action!!</p>
<p>Citizens can voice their support or opposition for changes by calling the committee at (317) 233-0696 or mailing a comment to the Criminal Law and Sentencing Policy Study Committee, Legislative Services Agency, 200 W. Washington St., Suite 301, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2789.<!--more--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/indiana-needs-constitutional-hemp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave the babies out of it, Mr. President!</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/leave-the-babies-out-of-it-mr-president/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/leave-the-babies-out-of-it-mr-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan E. Jarvis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there nothing sacred anymore? Seriously! The battle for state autonomy is now coming from Planned Parenthood &#8212; and why? You won&#8217;t believe this&#8230; Indiana passed a law, HEA 1210, which defunds Indiana agencies that are in contract with and/or giving grants to organizations who are performing abortions (Analysis on Indiana Court Ruling on Planned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/thumb_pregnancy_stage.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-82" src="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/thumb_pregnancy_stage.jpg" alt="" width="118" height="80" /></a>Is there nothing sacred anymore? Seriously! The battle for state autonomy is now coming from Planned Parenthood &#8212; and why? You won&#8217;t believe this&#8230;<span id="more-81"></span></p>
<p>Indiana passed a law, HEA 1210, which defunds Indiana agencies that are in contract with and/or giving grants to organizations who are performing abortions (<em>Analysis on Indiana Court Ruling on Planned Parenthood Funding</em>, 2011). On June 1, 2011, The Obama administration, represented by Donald Berwick, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, spoke out against the Indiana law &#8212; citing that the law was contrary to federal law. And this led to the decision which took place on June 24, 2011, by District Court Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, which issued an injunction against the Indiana law, citing that it was in violation of the Medicaid&#8217;s Freedom of Choice Requirements. And now the battle will ensue as to whether or not Indiana will be able to make an autonomous decision without the federal government attempting to bully and/or intimidate?</p>
<p>The founding fathers understood that a system of federalism needed to be in place &#8212; which is simply a system in which two differing, yet equal powers, vis-a-vis, the states and the federal government, would have their own specific duties and responsibilities &#8212; and this separation of powers is needed to keep the power of the citizenry close to home. The idea that the founders would have wanted a federal government which dictates and demands adherence to certain federal laws, which incidentally are out of their jurisidiction, would be a farcical idea at best. But this is what&#8217;s happening. If Indiana cannot make its own laws, and its own regulations as to where monies are to be distributed, especially in a time of recession, then how free are we at the state level? This question beckons an answer, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/leave-the-babies-out-of-it-mr-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Reserve Notes explained</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/78/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/78/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiat money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Notes explained in a way that will leave you asking, Why do we have the Federal Reserve? The Federal Reserve has done nothing but manipulate the monetary system of our government in ways that we may never know. Listen to how many times they have created bubbles and spikes/down turns in our system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal Notes explained in a way that will leave you asking, Why do we have the Federal Reserve?<span id="more-78"></span></p>
<p>The Federal Reserve has done nothing but manipulate the monetary system of our government in ways that we may never know. Listen to how many times they have created bubbles and spikes/down turns in our system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/78/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Tenth Amendment shoot down Commerce Clause?</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/will-tenth-amendment-shoot-down-commerce-clause/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/will-tenth-amendment-shoot-down-commerce-clause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 05:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd amenmdent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gary Marbut, 65, lives alone outside Missoula, in a solar-powered geodesic dome he built from a kit, on the remnant of a cattle ranch his family once owned and this is where the fight for state right's for intrastate commerce will take place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/dont-tread-150x1501.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-83" src="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/dont-tread-150x1501.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Gary Marbut, 65, lives alone outside Missoula, in a solar-powered geodesic dome he built from a kit, on the remnant of a cattle ranch his family once owned and this is where the fight for states&#8217; rights for intrastate commerce will take place.<span id="more-76"></span></p>
<p>Ten state attorney generals, dozens of elected officials and an array of conservative groups are backing the legal challenge he engineered to get his constitutional theory before the Supreme Court. A federal appeals court in San Francisco is now considering his case.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is really about states&#8217; rights and federal power rather than gun control,&#8221; Mr. Marbut says. There is &#8220;an emerging awareness by the people of America that the federal government has gone too far,&#8221; he maintains, &#8220;and it&#8217;s dependent on a really weird interpretation.&#8221;</p>
<p>He is talking about the 1942 Supreme Court case of Wickard v. Filburn, The question in 1942 was whether the federal government could regulate wheat a farmer grew for use on his own farm. But the constitutional issue concerned how far Congress&#8217;s authority to oversee interstate commerce stretched.</p>
<p>read more here:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304584404576442440490097046.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsTop">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304584404576442440490097046.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsTop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/will-tenth-amendment-shoot-down-commerce-clause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul is the MAN!!</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/ron-paul-is-the-man/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/ron-paul-is-the-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video link For 30 years Ron Paul has been saying the same thing about our federal government and he is finally  getting some of his efforts rewarded. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code></p>
<p>Video link</code></p>
<p>For 30 years Ron Paul has been saying the same thing about our federal government and he is finally  getting some of his efforts rewarded.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/ron-paul-is-the-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriots of Hate?</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/patriots-of-hate/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/patriots-of-hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second year in a row Patriot groups make the top 1000 in a list of hate groups compiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center. This year, again, the Tenth Amendment Center didn&#8217;t make the list. I know!, it&#8217;s pretty disheartening &#8211; keep your chin up, maybe next year. I went through all 58 state&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the second year in a row Patriot groups make the <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/news/us-hate-groups-top-1000">top 1000</a> in a list of hate groups compiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center. This year, again, the Tenth Amendment Center didn&#8217;t make the list. I know!, it&#8217;s pretty disheartening &#8211; keep your chin up, maybe next year.<span id="more-59"></span></p>
<p>I went through all 58 state&#8217;s (pun intended) on the list, I see no Patriot groups at all! For the most part it&#8217;s racist groups both black and white.</p>
<p>They did list some others,</p>
<p>“Nativist extremist” groups – organizations that go beyond mere advocacy of restrictive immigration policy to actually confront or harass suspected undocumented immigrants or their employers – saw their numbers increase by 3 percent, from 309 groups to 319&#8243;.</p>
<p>If the Federal Guv-ment ain&#8217;t goin&#8217; to do it,why not?  I don&#8217;t know a whole lot about these group,there may be some that are truly hater&#8217;s, but I would say most of them are just plain irate off that their government isn&#8217;t doing their job!</p>
<p>&#8220;But the most dramatic growth in the radical right came in the anti-government “Patriot” movement. These conspiracy-minded organizations, which see the federal government as their primary enemy, grew by 61 percent over the previous year. Their numbers increased to 824 groups in 2010, from 512 groups a year earlier. Previously, the only higher count of Patriot groups came in 1996, during the movement’s heyday, when the SPLC found 858 groups. Militias, the paramilitary arm of the Patriot movement, grew from 127 groups to 330 – a 160 percent increase&#8221;.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know we Patriots had a &#8220;paramilitary arm?&#8221; Why aren&#8217;t we using it to stop the stupidty in Washington?  (in jest)</p>
<p>&#8220;These conspiracy-minded organizations&#8221; UH?&#8230; ok, didn&#8217;t they get the memo that conspiracies have went mainstream and that we have actually have proven that many of them are true? Just read the Constitution &#8212; it is all right there and has been there for 235 years! That&#8217;s right! I forgot the Constitution isn&#8217;t real either!</p>
<p>&#8220;I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do. What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of God, I will do.&#8221;<br />
— Edward Everett Hale (1822-1909</p>
<p>With the advent of the Internet there should be NO reason why a citizen cannot find the truth of what is happening with our overreaching, out of control government, supreme court and states!</p>
<p>&#8220;A well instructed people alone can be permanently a FREE people!&#8221;<br />
-James Madison</p>
<p>It is so easy to sign up for whatever <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Indiana-Tenth-Amendment-Center/167871869934752">group</a> or <a href="http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/">organization</a> you want and get the<a href="http://www.tomwoods.com/"> information</a> you need to be an <a href="http://constitution.i2i.org/sources-for-constitutional-scholars/">&#8220;Informed Citizen&#8221;</a></p>
<p>So stop being a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Runaway-Slave-The-Documentary-with-CL-Bryant/100306746693768?sk=wall">slave</a> , on the government&#8217;s plantation. Escape the the world of the uninformed and brainwashed; it&#8217;s really easy to to do; all you have to do is put a little effort into it and the next thing you know, you&#8217;re writing articles and blogs and asking for others to escape slavery and enter into<a href="http://constitution.org/c5/"> political freedom</a>.</p>
<p>Surgo ut Prosum- I rise so that I maybe useful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/patriots-of-hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No anchor baby for Indiana Immigration Law</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/no-anchor-baby-for-indiana-immigration-law/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/no-anchor-baby-for-indiana-immigration-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker blocked two parts of the bill and wrote a 35 page ruling on Indiana’s attempt to protect it’s borders. Judge Parker said portions of the law are &#8220;seriously flawed and generally unsuccessful.&#8221; At issue is the arrest powers for police against immigrants who haven&#8217;t committed crimes and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/Baby_with_Pacifier_11.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-52" src="http://indianatac.tenthamendmentcenter.com/files/2011/07/Baby_with_Pacifier_11-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Last Friday U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker blocked two parts of the bill and wrote a 35 page ruling on Indiana’s attempt to protect it’s borders. <span id="more-48"></span>Judge Parker said portions of the law are &#8220;seriously flawed and generally unsuccessful.&#8221; At issue is the arrest powers for police against immigrants who haven&#8217;t committed crimes and making it illegal for immigrants to use ID cards issued by foreign consulates as proof of identification.<br />
The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana and the National Immigration Law Center sued the state in May, contending the law gives police sweeping arrest powers against immigrants who haven&#8217;t committed crimes and that the ID cards would interfere with foreign treaties allowing them.<br />
The FBI says the consular cards, issued by the Mexican government, are not a reliable form of identification, because there&#8217;s no way to verify the true identity of the cardholder. The FBI told Congress those cards are open to fraud and forgery.<br />
<span>Senator <span>Delph</span> said that “Judge Evans Barker found Section 19 to violate the Fourth Amendment, but it is unclear how a statute can facially violate the Fourth Amendment.”</span><br />
The Fourth Amendment states:<br />
The right of the people to be secure in their persons,houses,papers,and effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated , and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.<br />
<span>Senator <span>Delph</span> was talking about it being facially sufficient &#8211; which means: appearing valid on its face.</span><br />
<span>&#8220;Today&#8217;s ruling can be seen as an indictment of the federal government on their failure to enact and enforce immigration policy. It underscores the challenge to Indiana and other state lawmakers who have tried to respond to Washington&#8217;s failure,&#8221; Attorney General Greg <span>Zoeller</span> said in a statement.</span><br />
&#8220;I am not surprised by this ruling in the least. This is just the beginning of the legal process and I look forward to working with (Attorney General Greg) Zoeller in defense of Indiana sovereignty and Hoosier taxpayers,&#8221; wrote the author of the immigration law, Senator Mike Delph (R-Carmel), in a release.<br />
On May 12 of this year the Indiana Supreme Court made a ruling on a case concerning the Fourth Amendment,<br />
David, Justice.<br />
A jury convicted Richard Barnes of Class A misdemeanor battery on a law enforcement officer, Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, and Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct. Barnes contests that the trial court‘s failure to advise the jury on the right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers constituted reversible error and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We hold that there is no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers. We further hold that the evidence was sufficient and affirm Barnes‘s convictions.<br />
So Hoosier&#8217;s have a Fourth Amendment right only when they leave the state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/no-anchor-baby-for-indiana-immigration-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To the TSA&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/to-the-tsa/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/to-the-tsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote a letter to the TSA about their Keystone cop antics; they responded. Have a look!How far is the TSA going to go in making our country look like morons? http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/tsa-forces-eldely-dying-woman-to-strip/ TSA spokeswoman Sari Koshetz told the newspaper she could not address specific cases, but noted that agents treat all passengers the same to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a letter to the TSA about their Keystone cop antics; they responded. Have a look!<span id="more-44"></span>How far is the TSA going to go in making our country look like morons?</p>
<p>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/tsa-forces-eldely-dying-woman-to-strip/</p>
<p>TSA spokeswoman Sari Koshetz told the newspaper she could not address<br />
specific cases, but noted that agents treat all passengers the same to<br />
ensure national security.</p>
<p>“TSA cannot exempt any group from screening because we know from<br />
intelligence that there are terrorists out there that would then exploit<br />
that vulnerability,” she said</p>
<p>And now we have a 95 year old from Florida being called terrorist!? Come on<br />
guys; you&#8217;re supposed to be our best and brightest. .</p>
<p>How about just making it policy to have a case by case interpretation of<br />
general guidelines that the TSA agents follow? With the current guidelines in place, any<br />
rule could be exploited.</p>
<p>Dennis Bamford<br />
IN-TAC Outreach Coordinator</p>
<p>And this is their PC answer:</p>
<p>In Response to your inquiry -</p>
<p>Thank you for your e-mail regarding the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) security screening.</p>
<p>Ongoing threats to aviation security require that certain security measures be undertaken. It is indeed frustrating for us as U.S. citizens to have our person and personal items inspected by strangers. TSA understands and appreciate this frustration, and we go to great lengths to train our Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) in the proper way to inspect passengers and their items. We practice these steps not only to enhance passenger security, but to provide first-class customer service. When necessary, we take the appropriate action to remedy a situation, including providing additional training and disciplinary action.</p>
<p>We hope this information is helpful.</p>
<p>TSA Contact Center</p>
<p>UPDATE: New  email from TSA</p>
<p>Thank you for your e-mail regarding the security screening procedures of<br />
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees at the Northwest Florida<br />
Regional Airport (VPS) security checkpoint.</p>
<p>TSA seeks to provide a high level of security and customer service to all who pass<br />
through the screening checkpoint.  Our policies and procedures focus on ensuring<br />
that all passengers, regardless of their personal situations and needs, are treated<br />
with respect and courtesy. </p>
<p>TSA reviewed the circumstances involving this screening and determined that our<br />
officers acted professionally and in accordance with proper screening procedures.<br />
Contrary to reports, the Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) at VPS did not<br />
require this passenger to remove her adult diaper.  While every person and item must<br />
be screened before entering the secure boarding area, our TSOs work with passengers<br />
to resolve security alarms in a respectful and sensitive manner.  In no instance<br />
would our officers ask a passenger to remove an adult diaper.</p>
<p>In line with his vision to accelerate TSA’s evolution into a truly risk-based,<br />
intelligence-driven organization, Administrator John Pistole has tasked the Agency<br />
with exploring additional ways to focus its resources and move beyond a<br />
one-size-fits-all system while maintaining a high level of security.  As part of<br />
this effort, TSA is actively reviewing its screening policies and procedures to<br />
streamline and improve the screening experience for low-risk populations.</p>
<p>TSA continues to develop and deploy new technologies to address the security threat.<br />
In the meantime, the use of additional screening enhances our ability to detect<br />
explosives at our Nation’s airport checkpoints, provides an additional layer of<br />
security at the checkpoint, and keeps the traveling public secure.</p>
<p>We hope this information is helpful.</p>
<p>TSA Contact Center</p>
<p>Tenthers, this is not our typical article. However, we want you all to be aware of the spin that the TSA and other federal agencies put on controversial issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/to-the-tsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justifiable Nullification!</title>
		<link>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/justifiable-nullification/</link>
		<comments>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/justifiable-nullification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bamford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;If you connect the notion of Rights to that of personnel interest,which is the only immutable point in the human heart,then the only way to govern is through fear&#8221;.  &#8211; John Adams Fear is the way that the federal government likes to rule. We&#8217;re all terrorists, so they have to grope and man-handle you and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you connect the notion of Rights to that of personnel interest,which is the only immutable point in the human heart,then the only way to govern is through fear&#8221;.  &#8211; John Adams<span id="more-43"></span></p>
<p>Fear is the way that the federal government likes to rule. We&#8217;re all terrorists, so they have to grope and man-handle you and your loved ones; they order new labels to be instituted on cigarettes with graphic pictures to scare you not to smoke; and the drug war has made anyone that that wants a little relief from certain aliments a criminal. The new rules from the FDA,FCC,EPA are all meant to scare you into thinking that &#8220;OH MY GOD! IF WE DON&#8217;T PASS THIS&#8230;. then we&#8217;re all going to died or be destitute.&#8221;</p>
<p>B.S.!</p>
<p>The criminals in government are intentionally passing laws that take OUR freedoms away. And some may say that my calling them criminals is too strong &#8212; but I do mean criminals &#8212; for they are not following the Supreme Law of the Land: The Constitution and The Bill of Rights. Laws that are passed by criminals are null and void!</p>
<p>So when a criminal breaks into your home and threatens your family,what are you going to do? Give them everything and help them load it into their van? NO!! You&#8217;re going to shoot them. This is called justifiable homicide.  And that is what the states are going to do to a criminalized government that has been robbing us for too long, but it&#8217;s called Justifiable Nullification. This won&#8217;t happen with violence, but with a return to founding principles.</p>
<p>Nullification is the right of the People. Just look around, it won&#8217;t be hard to find a law that goes against the principles of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.The government is in the the business of creating a closed system by which ,if you get in,you can help those that will help themselves and not the People that they represent, take a look for yourself , <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org">http://www.opensecrets.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiana.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/06/justifiable-nullification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

